[sdiy] Moogey jitter
Richard Wentk
richard at skydancer.com
Sun Apr 16 17:23:12 CEST 2006
At 03:44 16/04/2006, you wrote:
>The link below is a magical moogy sawtooth wave spliced into a cold,
>perfect, digitally stable, un-antialiased sawtooth generated in CoodEdit.
>It switches back and forth several times. Remember, this is the most
>extreme difference in the world theoretically. But there is virtually no
>audible difference.
This depends how good your ears are. I can hear a difference quite clearly.
It's not ultra-obvious, but you won't get the Moog Sound [tm] just from the
VCOs.
>Measuring jitter means nothing unless one compares it to other analogs.
>
>http://home.att.net/~elhardt5/Sawtooths.wav
If you do a spectral plot in Cool Edit, you can see two things very clearly.
The first is a random-ish amplitude modulation. I wouldn't be surprised if
this were supply related, and the 'jitter' is actually coming from the
other VCOs and LFOs.
I could be wrong about that, and the only way to find out is to pull a VCO
out of its rack and check it on its own.
The second is very subtle random pitch drift. It's hard to see with an FFT
because the pitch resolution is poor down at the fundamental, but I'd guess
it's a few cents or so.
Both of those taken together will combine to create a randomised chorus
effect when more oscillators are added, especially in the mid/upper range.
Add more nonlinearities because of the VCF and VCA stages, and you have a
significant timbral effect.
I have no idea what Kevin's history is on AH. And to be honest I'm not
really interested. But I am interested in the fact that after 40-odd years
no one has yet managed to exactly copy the Moog sound without using Moog
circuitry. Since it is such a distinctive sound - I don't think anyone is
arguing that it doesn't exist - I don't think trying to work out what
creates it is entirely a waste of time.
Richard
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list