[sdiy] fare thee well DX7
Seb Francis
seb at burnit.co.uk
Sat Apr 15 20:44:48 CEST 2006
I'm pretty sure the FM7 won't save it's patches as SysEx (only the other
way round) - at least I can't see a way to do it.
But why would you want to use a DX7 anyway if you had FM7? Doesn't the
DX7 create it's sounds digitally? So what's the advantage in having a
bulky bit of hardware with a horrible editing interface when you can
just use the FM7.
Seb
Nicholas Gregorich wrote:
> I thought FM7 patches were not able to be loaded on to DX7s. It would indeed make a nice virtual editor, but I don't think its possible.
>
> Nick.
>
> On Saturday, April 15, 2006, at 11:15AM, dustin sedlacek <dustin.sedlacek at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> <<Original Attached>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> I really like the FM7 i love the syncable envelopes ! and i believe
>> that the sysex from the FM7 can be loaded into the DX ( i do not know
>> how )so it would make a handy virtual editor
>>
>> On 4/15/06, *Jaco Sloof* <jacosloof at yahoo.com
>> <mailto:jacosloof at yahoo.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I know exactly what you mean Pascal.
>>
>> Over the years you get to know the user interface quite well, but
>> for people
>> who have never worked with fm-synthesis before, it's a taunting
>> machine to say
>> the least. In the end, I gave up fighting with the U.I
>> alltogether. In it's
>> place comes the SLMS, my rev. 1 ASM-1 stripboard synth. I need to
>> fill the hole
>> in the pallette of sound now, so I'm considering FM7. Although,
>> Reaktor would
>> be good enough too (maybe even better).
>>
>> Greets, Jaco Sloof
>>
>>
>>
>> --- P Kleine Neerken <pkn at quicknet.nl <mailto:pkn at quicknet.nl>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello Jaco,
>> >
>> > Thanks a lot Jaco (also for removing the dust :)). The DX7 has
>> found a
>> > good home.
>> > Where I work we have backup batteries that can replace the
>> empty one, so
>> > as soon as I'm at work I will replace it with a fresh one.
>> > I must say that I like the DX7 a lot, altough creating new
>> sounds is not
>> > easy on this thing. But trying to create some new sounds is
>> fun, and
>> > there are enough editor/librarian programs for this synth to
>> make it a
>> > bit easier.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Pascal.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Jaco Sloof wrote:
>> >
>> > >Hi list,
>> > >
>> > >I fired it up about an hour before the kind person arrived.
>> Got it warmed up
>> > a
>> > >bit to the point that I could check battery voltage ( 0.1
>> Volt!), and play
>> > with
>> > >it for the last time. The Tubular Bells preset still rocks.
>> > >
>> > >Now that the DustyX7 found a new home, I have more space
>> available to put my
>> > >other music making apparatus to good use.
>> > >
>> > >To Pascal kleine Neerken: Thanks for giving old instruments a
>> new life.
>> > >
>> > >Greets, Jaco Sloof
>> > >
>> > >__________________________________________________
>> > >Do You Yahoo!?
>> > >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> > >http://mail.yahoo.com
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dustin
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list