SV: Re: [sdiy] analogue physical modelling organ dream

[Magnus Danielson]

From: karl dalen <dalenkarl at yahoo.se>
Subject: SV: Re: [sdiy] analogue physical modelling organ dream
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 23:33:18 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <20050926213318.68960.qmail at web25502.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>

> 
> --- jhaible at debitel.net skrev:
> 
> > Zitat von anthony <aankrom at bluemarble.net>:
> > 
> > > >I have approx. fifty  512-stage BBDs, so I could build 4 octaves of a
> > fully
> > > > polyphonic
> > > 
> > > Are you still using the same setup that's on your page?
> > 
> > This one: http://home.debitel.net/user/jhaible/jh_ana_phys_mod.html ?
> > No. The Storm Tide doesn't really track well enough.
> > I built a better delay line, and tried less complex nonlinearity
> > and filter circuits. (As opposed to the waveshaper and Buchla Gate
> > I had used to create the mp3's on my web site.)
> > But the results are not encouraging. Not at all. I probably have to go 
> > back to my first experiments and check what settings really brought
> > the good results.
> > 
> > 
> > > I think it sounds kind of cool, kind of a creepy and psychotic flute.
> > 
> > I had hoped to get something like that flute wuth the new setup. But sadly, 
> > it's not even close so far.
> 
> When i used the SAD1024 as delay using the very same setup(pan flute)
> that i had used for my digital delay i was a bit dissapointed too,
> the BBD are not a trugh zero thing therefore it loses in the
> charachter and sound depth departmenet compared to the DDL setup,
> there was a significant difference in sound.  :-(

Have you considered a dual-chain setup where you either have one delay fixed
at the nominal delay or just running in opposite delay. That would give you a
thru-zero setup at the cost of two BBDs instead of one.

Just a thought...

Cheers,
Magnus - heading south tomorrow!