[sdiy] A crazy idea..

[Scott Stites]

....and no static at all.  =-D

----- Original Message -----
From: "Harry Bissell Jr" <harrybissell at prodigy.net>
To: "Scott Stites" <scottnoanh at peoplepc.com>; "Jeff Farr"
<moogah at gmail.com>; "synth-diy" <synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl>;
<peter at buzzclick-music.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: [sdiy] A crazy idea..


> Ahhh silly me... of course you could use an AM
> system as well as FM (which I described). Depends on
> what range you need.  AM is of course much cheaper
> to demodulate. You just need a rectifier and filter.
>
> FM will have much better speed of response...
>
> H^) harry
>
> --- Scott Stites <scottnoanh at peoplepc.com> wrote:
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> I imagine you could use Buchla's ghost whatsis
> technique (recording audio through a VCA controlled by
> the CV you want to record and then extracting the CV
> via an envelope follower for later performance).
> Peter Grenader has a pretty cool thing on his site
> about that - don't have the link offhand.  Peter?
>
> Cheers,
> Scott
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Farr
> Sent: Oct 4, 2005 4:34 PM
> To: synth-diy
> Subject: [sdiy] A crazy idea..
>
> I've got a MAudio 1010lt audio interface in my
> computer at the moment and one of the neat features of
> the card is tha ability to stack as many of 3 other
> cards into the system for a rather large number of
> inputs and outputs (more than 30).  Now, perhaps I'm
> way off base here, but I believe it would be possible
> to patch together a modular so that both the audio and
> control signals are routed through the computer such
> that complete performances can be recorded.  Obviously
> the audio will work, but I can only speculate about
> controll signals being properly recorded...  Any
> thoughts?
>
>
> ________________________________________PeoplePC
> OnlineA better way to Internethttp://www.peoplepc.com
>
>