SV: [sdiy] New Sample & INFINITE Hold chip!

[karl dalen]

--- Peter Ullrich <synpro at networld.at> skrev:
> Bad news: It has a very small 5-SOT23 package so breadbording is a 
> little bit difficult - but possible.
> The EEPROM storage is 50000 times minimum...
> What happens after that?

Your infinite hold times becomes no hold times at all!
What a miss, why didnt they use a sram cell instead!

Really, i think that chip has minor applications in 
analog synths! Bogus expencive stuff, why would i need
infinite hold time? Im perfectly happy if it holds 20-30 secs!

Give me "one" reason to consider it in a real life application?

Regards
KD