SV: Re: [sdiy] QVCO schemo up

[harrybissell]

Then I retract the nomination of Jim Patchell.

Jim is ~barred~ for life from any FURTHER accolades involving the
CA3280   :^P

H^) harry

James Patchell wrote:

> I originally took the circuit from AD when I wrote my article...and changed
> the multipliers to CA3280E's...I would say the credit goes to AD... :-)
>
> If you look at my article...I give three references...the top one being
> Analog Devices.
>
> At 01:40 AM 11/12/2005 +0100, karl dalen wrote:
> >So, to whom shall i give the DIY nobel price? Ian, Jim, AD?
> >
> >KD?
> >--- Ian Fritz <ijfritz at earthlink.net> skrev:
> >
> > > At 03:00 PM 11/11/05, James Patchell wrote:
> > > >But not very different from the one in the Nov/Dec issue of Polyphony
> > 1980
> > > >on page 26 .... :-).... or on page 80 of the Analog Devices Nonlinear
> > > >Circuits Handbook...
> > >
> > > Yep, there it is.  Fig. 9, p.80, NCH.  Exactly the same circuit.
> > >
> > > (I didn't save my Polyphonies.  Was that one of your contributions,
> > > Jim?  Is it up anywhere?)
> > >
> > > I had another, cruder version in ENotes #82 (1977). It limited against the
> > > supply rails and had a fair bit of distortion.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > >    Ian
> > >
> > >
>
>          -Jim
> ***************************************************************
> http://www.oldcrows.net/~patchell
>
> ***************************************************************