[sdiy] Is everything digital?

[xmurz at gmx.de]

>A comparator is indeed a digital device, a single bit Analog to Digital
>converting device. That the period resulting from this conversion may or may
>not be periodic (depending upon the input analog signal) the output has only
>2 numerical states.

not on my oscilloscope.
Or are you using single electron transistors already?

You, I mean some people on this list, should read more theorethical work
if you want to talk about theorethical subjects. 

Otherwise it really gets out of hand.
And in the end nobody knows whats right or wrong in the end, all
confused.

There are definitions, but please don't take those online help stuff as is,
some of it is meant for 10th-grades and include errors and simplifications.
(like the Bohr atom model)
Also, there are technical names which are totally wrong, if
you dig deeper it gets pretty obvious: marketing.

What you are developing is a new metatheorie, a theorie about theories.
But before you go head into such subjects, please do some research, or at least
try to refer to well respected articles that are the backbone of your "proof".

I'm not going to discuss about this subject, I think it got much to philosophical on the way
and personal, too. And I think I may well get something wrong, too. It would take some
time to research and I have enough other subjects to work on.

I think some of your statements collide with existing definitions, thats all I'm saying.

- Hans