[sdiy] Is everything digital?

[Neil Bradley]

Scott Gravenhorst wrote:

>>>However, a digital system, to be useful as such, does require a reliable and
>>>predictable recognition of such states.  And if not useful as such, why then
>>>call it digital?
>>My Windows computer system isn't totally reliable, but I still think it's
>>useful, and most people would certainly call it digital.
> Well, that is an unreliable design, however, that doesn't apply.  I was
> referring to the states themselves as reliable and predictable, not to a
> system that was poorly designed.

No operating system, especially Linux, is a good design.

-->Neil