[sdiy] Is everything digital?

[Scott Gravenhorst]

Glen <mclilith at charter.net> wrote:
>At 12:40 PM 5/14/2005 , Scott Gravenhorst wrote:
>
>>However, a digital system, to be useful as such, does require a reliable and
>>predictable recognition of such states.  And if not useful as such, why then
>>call it digital?
>
>My Windows computer system isn't totally reliable, but I still think it's
>useful, and most people would certainly call it digital.

Well, that is an unreliable design, however, that doesn't apply.  I was
referring to the states themselves as reliable and predictable, not to a
system that was poorly designed.

---------------------------------------------------------
- Where merit is not rewarded, excellence fades.
- Hydrogen is pointless without solar.
- What good are laws that only lawyers understand?
- The media's credibility should always be questioned.
- The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist.
- Governments do nothing well, save collect taxes.

-- Scott Gravenhorst | LegoManiac / Lego Trains / RIS 1.5
-- Linux Rex         | RedWebMail by RedStarWare
-- FatMan: home1.gte.net/res0658s/fatman/
-- NonFatMan: home1.gte.net/res0658s/electronics/
-- Autodidactic Master of Arcane and Hidden Knowledge.