[sdiy] Is everything digital?
Glen
mclilith at charter.net
Sat May 14 19:19:53 CEST 2005
At 12:59 PM 5/14/2005 , Tim Daugard wrote:
>
>> My electronics education taught me that "digital" circuitry had a
>discrete
>> number of normal states (that is, ignoring any malfunction of the
>> equipment, etc). By far, the most common digital circuitry in use
>today is
>> binary digital circuitry. There should be no reason we couldn't
>> *theoretically* have digital circuitry with a billion possible voltage
>> states. I've personally seen trinary digital circuitry, and I'm sure
>that
>> other circuitry has been built with four or more discrete voltage
>levels.
>
>I built a foot pedal switch board that uses trinary "logic". Two wires
>and ground result in nine distinct states. It uses transistors to set
>levels and opamps to decode the levels. This is digital? right.
>
>> So, perhaps "digital" isn't a totally incorrect word? I would agree
>that
>> quantized is also a good term to use.
>
>My next switch board projuct was going to go for 8 states on 1 wire and
>ground. This means I can use a standard guitar cable to control eight
>signal paths.
>
>I don't know who started this conversation - Earthlink was down
>yesterday and I think I didn't see the orginal message, but I hope I'm
>on track.
Hi Tim,
I started this, just a short time earlier today. I certainly agree with
your concept of digital, in regard to the foot pedal switch. So would the
retired military people who taught me electronics several years ago.
take care,
Glen
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list