[sdiy] Additive Synthesis - Wendy would say it works...
harrybissell
harrybissell at prodigy.net
Wed Mar 23 06:39:50 CET 2005
Magnus Danielson wrote: <snipp'ed>
> > It should have a parameter called "phat" ;^)
>
> Yeah, that one is obvious. But then we can add "woodyness", "piercyness",
> "stringiness" etc. etc. "funkyness" anyone?
woah YEAH baby... I'm getting a lot of e-mails about the "woodyness" thing
so I think I got that covered... ;^P
"piercyness" that would be cool too. Goes with my nipple ring and all that...
"stringiness" ... that might be OK but I don't know... I don't like my meat
stringy, for instance. Still I suppose I could turn it all the way down if I
don't
like it...
"Funkyness" .... that's the stuff I need. a white boy can never have enough
funkyness, imho
> This is what I mean, we don't lack imagination to come up with yeat another
> way to synthesize sound. We lack imagination to come up with one that really
> make sense!
well they make sense to me. Now how do we code them ? I have to admit that
(as much as people hated them) the FM instruments did a better job at
synthesizing
sound like "fender rhodes" (piano) than any analog synth would. So what will
the
additive synths bring us ?
(I admit that I have not listened to the mp3 we were vectored to, my computer
cannot handle more than about 22khz. I'll see if I can get it from work :^)
H^) harry (everythings better with a bbd)
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list