[sdiy] Additive Synthesis - Wendy would say it works...

harrybissell harrybissell at prodigy.net
Wed Mar 23 06:39:50 CET 2005


Magnus Danielson wrote:  <snipp'ed>

> > It should have a parameter called "phat"    ;^)
>
> Yeah, that one is obvious. But then we can add "woodyness", "piercyness",
> "stringiness" etc. etc. "funkyness" anyone?

woah YEAH baby...  I'm getting a lot of e-mails about the "woodyness" thing
so I think I got that covered...  ;^P

"piercyness"  that would be cool too. Goes with my nipple ring and all that...

"stringiness" ... that might be OK but I don't know... I don't like my meat
stringy, for instance. Still I suppose I could turn it all the way down if I
don't
like it...

"Funkyness" ....  that's the stuff I need.  a white boy can never have enough
funkyness, imho

> This is what I mean, we don't lack imagination to come up with yeat another
> way to synthesize sound. We lack imagination to come up with one that really
> make sense!

well they make sense to me. Now how do we code them ?  I have to admit that
(as much as people hated them) the FM instruments did a better job at
synthesizing
sound like "fender rhodes" (piano) than any analog synth would.  So what will
the
additive synths bring us ?

(I admit that I have not listened to the mp3 we were vectored to, my computer
cannot handle more than about 22khz.  I'll see if I can get it from work :^)

H^) harry  (everythings better with a bbd)




More information about the Synth-diy mailing list