[sdiy] JAy

[Bob Weigel]

Excuuuse me....I thought this was over.  But..here's a logical GOAD that 
should be considered Jay and anyone else who thinks this way.   Listen.  
There is NO EXCUSE FOR BLOWING UP RANDOM PEOPLE... If the IDIOTS had 
GUTS ENOUGH to go and actually face the particular people they had 
problems with...we'd be on the 'first page' in terms of them having any 
kind of POSSIBLE credibility in their actions.  But no..they are gutless 
imbociles who just blow up..whoever happens to be on a bus or walking 
down the street! <churchlady> Can we have another chorus of 'There's a 
special place in hell"??  Thaaaank you. :-) </churchlady>
  JAY!!!   YOU BELOW SAY THAT THESE INNOCENT (as far as I know...they 
weren't involved in ANY of the decisions that have led to others being 
killed.  GROUP PUNISHMENT is NOT RIGHT ding dong!) people are not worthy 
of tears.   IT IS NOT ABOUT CRYING FOR THE ENGLISH GOVERNMENT 
YOU....grrrrr!  It's about crying for innocent people Jay.  What kind of 
callous numbskull are you!   THINK Jay.  Think about what you are saying 
before you just..blurt it out.  THESE PEOPLE CAN EXPECT TEARS JAY.  As 
far as I know..they were just people trying to scrape together enough to 
pay rent and maybe make a positive difference in a difficult world.  
Could we PLEASE put a lid on this and boot the next person that spouts 
terrorist doctrine in here??    -Bob

Jay Vaughan wrote:

> At 14:32 -0400 7/7/05, SRRecords at aol.com wrote:
>
>> What are we to conclude from:
>>  >There is no right way to kill humans, period.
>> coupled with
>>  >England, it is in fact War on your own terms, as you deserve.
>> We must, it seems, conclude that Jay thinks 'there is no right way
>> to kill humans, period, except this one'.
>>
>
>
> errmm.. no.  there is no right way to kill humans, period.  if england 
> continues to do so, and justify it in its own cushy legal/illegal 
> terms, it cannot 'suffer rightness' and expect pity for whatever 
> retaliation it incurs.
>
> war is the way of the weak.  honest.  i feel that even stronger today 
> than i did yesterday.  i will not cry for englands' terror, simple, 
> because it will use my tears for its own ends..
>
>
>> Also, I wonder what Jay means by "right way" to kill humans - does
>> he mean methods to kill humans (as in, 'using a bomb' is more
>> correct than 'using a gun'), or does he mean 'killing humans is
>> wrong always'.  I think he thinks he means the latter, but then the
>> contradiction noted above undermines that....
>
>
> you found a nice crack for your argument, but i'm afraid you're being 
> weedy.
>
>> Either way, all this is the mark of someone
>> ranting-without-thinking, and of course what appears to
>> be sociopathology for its own sake (hence the insensitivity and
>> mean-spiritedness).
>
>
> don't cry for me britannia.  pax americana.
>