[sdiy] How does a DCO work?
ASSI
Stromeko at compuserve.de
Tue Jan 4 21:22:48 CET 2005
On Dienstag, 4. Januar 2005 11:12, Paul Maddox wrote:
> > The problem is that there are situations where a PA-like oscillator
> > - in the sense that you have a phasor going round and round based
> > on accumulated phase increments and indexing into a table - is
> > implemented at 44.1, or whatever, as happens in some softsynths.
>
> agreed, but its *NOT* a fault of the phase accumulator, its a fault
> of using fixed frequency systems.
The only thing that you need not worry about in a variable frequency
phase accumulator is interpolation between phase samples. You are still
dealing with a discrete time, discrete amplitude system. Even though
many systems use simple phase truncation or rounding to nearest integer
phase, it is possible to implement the interpolation required at fixed
frequency to be "perfect". Linear or polynomial interpolation is not
"perfect", but often adequate considering other sources of noise and
distortion in the system.
Note that if you want to resolve intervals to 1cent for the whole
audible spectrum (fmax=20kHz) the phase resolution needs to be better
than 14ns, the accumulator more than 27bit and a wavetable in a
non-interpolated implementation would have more than 128Mwords of
samples. Such a system is just barely realizable (the question of fixed
or variable frequency doesn't change things very much) and you'd
probably have to use some sort of interpolation and/or fractional phase
accumulation to reduce the clock frequency and the wavetable size to
something more manageable.
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk sonic heaven]>+
Q series MIDI Implementation & additional documentation:
http://Stromeko.Synth.net/#WaldorfQDocs
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list