[sdiy] Sixtrack wierdness

[mark verbos]

agreed. I'd still rather have a Pro One though. ;)

Mark



Rude 66 wrote:

>true, but the sixtrak in unison mode is a very seriously thick sounding
>synth. i don't think i would part easily with mine. yeah its architecture is
>limited in possibilities, and i'd probably trade it for a pro one.. otoh,
>it's one of my few analogue polys, and i have more than enough monos..
>
>r./
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Senso" <senso at dds.nl>
>To: <synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl>
>Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 1:35 PM
>Subject: Re: [sdiy] Sixtrack wierdness
>
>
>  
>
>>>2005 feb 23  kl. 22.11 skrev mark verbos:
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>never mind. I did a software reset and it works fine.
>>>>
>>>>Mark
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Congratulations! How good is the 6-track comapred to Pro-One?
>>>
>>>-A.
>>>      
>>>
>>Polyphony is it's advantage and in itself it has a decent analogue
>>sound. But if you start comparing the single voices, or the
>>modulation options, the Sixtrak doesn't even come close to the
>>Pro-one. Cost cutting to compete being a major factor here.
>>The Six is an analogue keyboard synth; the Pro One a PowerPack. I
>>would trade those six voices for the single one without blinking an
>>eye and cackling hysterically all the way home.
>>
>>Senso
>>
>>--
>>
>>http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZdr_senso
>>
>>----------------------------------------------------------------
>>................... VINTAGE PLANET ..................
>>.................. The Last Resort for .................
>>.. parts, books, manuals, sounds and more ...
>>............. http://www.vintageplanet.nl ...........
>>----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>