[sdiy] CA3130 problem solved ->> S&H problem now

Rutger Vlek rutgervlek at hotmail.com
Thu Dec 22 01:25:53 CET 2005


Hi René

your were right about the offsetting. I made the R7 modification you 
suggested, and that helps. I removed the offsetting at the input Op-Amp, but 
i'm confused what to do about the output op-amp. How do i get the same 
scaling as with the input??

Greetings,

Rutger


>From: René Schmitz <uzs159 at uni-bonn.de>
>To: Rutger Vlek <rutgervlek at hotmail.com>
>CC: synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>Subject: Re: [sdiy] CA3130 problem solved ->> S&H problem now
>Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 01:30:06 +0100
>
>Hi Rutger and all,
>
>I don't know if this has anything to do with your problem, but what I find 
>strange about this schematic is the way in which the FET is turned on and 
>off. A positive drain will cut off the FET just as a negative gate. I'd say 
>that R7 should go to between the output of U1-D and the Gate of Q1. Maybe 
>I'd make it a bit larger than 10k.  All that offsetting of the input and 
>output would be unnecessary then. Besides that the biassing on the input 
>depends on how you couple in the signal, if there is a cap on the output of 
>the steering circuit, then its indeed Ub/2, if not then it'll be rather 
>something like Ub/3.
>
>Cheers,
>  René
>
>Rutger Vlek wrote:
>>Haha, no, i didn't miss it. The person who couldn't get it to work was me, 
>>i think. And if it wasn't me then i did miss it.
>>
>>I have built Ray's Single Chip sample and hold exactly according to the 
>>schematic, except for the transistors MPF102. I couldn't find those and 
>>replaced then with 2N5486 first and now i've tried the BF245C, but no 
>>change... The problem is that my sample & hold doesn't trigger the "hold" 
>>transistor right.
>>
>>What happens is as follows:
>>
>>-When the Sample Rate potmeter is turned completely to the left the CV at 
>>the input is directly passed through to the output, without any change (at 
>>least, that's what is sounds like. But it's possible that it's resampled 
>>with a very high frequency, beyond my hearing capabilities).
>>
>>-When i turn the Sample Rate potmeter to the right suddenly the input 
>>voltage at that moment is being held at the same level. You could say that 
>>the "hold" is now working. But....for an indefinite periode.
>>
>>So that's the problem. All components seem to be the right ones, the only 
>>difference with Ray's version is the transistors and:
>>
>>- two 3M resistors are 3M3 ones (but that shouldn't make the difference). 
>>At least in the filter for the clock signal i calculated the frequency 
>>difference between 3M3 and 3M and that's really a minor difference.
>>
>>- the 200pF clock capacitor (C2) is actually a 220pF. But again...no big 
>>difference.
>>
>>I'm really stumped, what could cause this problem....
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Rutger
>>
>>>From: Ian Fritz <ijfritz at earthlink.net>
>>>To: "Rutger Vlek" <rutgervlek at hotmail.com>
>>>Subject: Re: [sdiy] CA3130 in Polyfusion Noise module...should a new  one 
>>>work?
>>>Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:14:11 -0700
>>>
>>>Did you miss the recent post from someone who could *not* get it to work?
>>>
>>>At 03:28 PM 12/21/05, you wrote:
>>>
>>>>Anyway, i'm a happy man now. Next thing is getting the S&H to work. But 
>>>>this should be ok since Ray Wilson designed it ;).
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>--
>uzs159 at uni-bonn.de
>http://www.uni-bonn.de/~uzs159
>
>





More information about the Synth-diy mailing list