[sdiy] MOSFET leakage.
René Schmitz
uzs159 at uni-bonn.de
Mon Dec 19 13:03:24 CET 2005
Hi Ian and all,
> Ah, yes. Same technique should work, though, unless the leakage is so
> small that the instrumentation current is much larger that what you are
> measuring.
In that case you wouldn't need to care about it anyway.
And your figure for the residual leakage suggests that cap leakage can
be neglected.
> No! Just plugged it all into my whiteboard. :-)
>
> Plastics are actually very good insulators. I remember a friend showing
> me that if you pot the contacts of a coax connector with 5-min epoxy
> then measure the resistance with an electrometer that the resistance is
> over 10^14 Ohm. That's roughly the point where you have to go to
> teflon, etc.
>
> The main worry would be conduction along the surface, but it doesn't
> seem to be an actual problem.
Much like I suspected. I think into the pico ampere range that is
sufficient, its the fempto region where this could create problems.
> What I've been looking at is the speced "drain cutoff current"
which is
> .5 uA. So 2 pA is a factor or 250,000 smaller.
Ok, I didn't check and had a value of 1nA in my head.
> Yeah, that's what I'm working on. Instead of your series R trick, I'm
> using pulse shaping to try to tame the overshoot. Keeping the
> comparitor from going into deep saturation seems to help a lot. Also I
> want to use a device with less capacitance. The BS170 and 2N7000 units
> have 60 pF input C.
There really aren't many good small signal MOSFETs, seems most of them
are switching devices.
> Interesting idea. I'll need to think about that some more. You mean
> generate counter-glitches using a second cap?
Exactly. An old RF trick, to cancel out influences of device
capacitances. Maybe the cancellation is not 100% perfect, but even 80%
or 90% would be an improvement.
Cheers,
René
--
uzs159 at uni-bonn.de
http://www.uni-bonn.de/~uzs159
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list