[sdiy] Re: Bypass caps
Seb Francis
seb at burnit.co.uk
Tue Dec 6 21:47:34 CET 2005
surely having a current limiting PSU (e.g. with an LM 723) would just
bring the voltage up as the caps charged?
seb
Harry Bissell Jr wrote:
> Just for the record (and noobs)
>
> another solution is to either
>
> Power one half the rack, then after a time delay
> of a second or so... power the other half using a relay.
>
> ~or~
>
> Power the whole system through some series resistors that limit the
> inrush current, then short across those resistors after a one second
> delay.
>
> This is how I did my system... but the 'brute force' larger supply is
> a valid option
> too. Its more size and weight, less complexity.
>
> Engineering... ~make the choice~
>
> H^) harry
>
> */Tim Daugard <daugard at sprintmail.com>/* wrote:
>
> From: "harrybissell"
> .
> >
> What price failure ? More time is wasted by NOT using sufficient
> bypass caps than is saved by not designing them in (in small
> production runs). It is really hard to OVERDO the caps, unless the
> power supply is unable to start because of the peak current :^P
> >
>
> Which happens, my system reached the point where the power supply was
> adequete for steady stae use, but couldn't power up the system. I had
> to unplug one row of modules from the power chain until the system
> powered up. When all the other modules had charge their caps, the last
> chain got pluged in. I finally solved that problem by putting in an
> upgraded power supply - two modules wide with 3X the current
> capability.
>
> Tim Daugard
> AG4GZ 30.4078N 86.6227W Alt: 12 feet above MSL
> http://home.sprintmail.com/~daugard/synth.htm
>
>
>
>
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list