Bypass caps (was:Re: [sdiy] Silly question about dual vs. quad op amps

limor ladyada at gmail.com
Mon Dec 5 22:08:42 CET 2005


adding -too many- caps is not necessarily a good idea and its
certainly a waste of money. lets be reasonable, people: a single .1uF
ceramic cap per IC is just fine unless there are multiple power lines
and the datasheet requests more. and, for high-current spike ICs, a
2uF tant or 20uF electrolytic for every 3-5 ICs to reduce resonant
ringing on spikes (Pease, pg 45)

   limor

On 12/5/05, Samppa Tolvanen <samppa.tolvanen at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/5/05, Harry Bissell Jr <harrybissell at prodigy.net> wrote:
> > I use .1uF caps for decoupling, one per IC pin.
> >  I would use more if the current draw of slew rate was
> >  very high, usually not an issue with TL07x series.
> >
> >  I do not share decoupling caps between duals.
> >  I run power supply traces to the capaciotr pins, then
> >  to the IC.  Sharing with two duals will probably mean that
> >  the ICs are too dar from the cap to be effective.
> >
>
> Lets try: 100nf  per each pin? 8 times per dual and 14 for quad?
> Strange shit, man :D
>
> S
>
>




More information about the Synth-diy mailing list