[sdiy] more sh-101 mods?

harrybissell harrybissell at prodigy.net
Mon Dec 5 01:56:30 CET 2005


The Vactol pot will only work in real high impedance apps... you will not
get a good
'end resistance' with it. In tone control apps that would mean sacrificing
a tiny
bit of the possible cut and boost...

...and you are right about the setting... people will just crank the knob
until they
get a good sound (or a ~bad~ one :^)

H^) harry

Paul Higgins wrote:

> > In my crystal ball... I see motorized potentiometers on a chip made
> > with
> > nanotechnology.
>
> Well, there *are* digital potentiometers, right?  Usually with fairly
> coarse resolution, naturally.  But the electronic potentiometers have
> been used for a lot of musical electronics, including guitar and bass
> preamps by ADA and Marshall, and I'm sure lots and lots of other stuff
> (consumer stereo equipment must use tons of those parts).
>
> The two-vactrol approach apparently worked OK for Mesa/Boogie, as I've
> never heard anyone say anything bad about the TriAxis.  As long as
> you're not expecting a lot of linearity, it probably will get the job
> done.  And the Fender tone control circuit that they replaced with the
> vactrols was plenty interactive to start with, so it's probably the
> ideal application for a two-vactrol "pot".
>
> -PRH




More information about the Synth-diy mailing list