[sdiy] Pot Survey
MBEDTOM at aol.com
MBEDTOM at aol.com
Sat Aug 27 04:48:23 CEST 2005
Before changing pots I would ask: "What problem exists for which a change in
potentiometer is the solution?"
Alpha pots (Mouser 31VJ401) cost $0.96 if you buy 10
Spectrol 248-series (Mouser 594-248-7104) cost $5.50 each, $4.82 (25)
Spectrol 249-series (Mouser 594-249-7104) cost $5.50 each, $4.82 (25)
Spectrol 148-series (Mouser 594-148-7104) cost $7.88 each, $6.30 (25)
Spectrol 149-series (Mouser 594-149-7104) cost $7.88 each, $6.30 (25)
Alpha pots are carbon composition, 1,000PPM/degree C, 15,000 turns rotation
life
Spectrol 248 pots are conductive plastic, 1,000PPM/degree C, 50,000 turns
rotation life
Spectrol 249 pots are cermet, 100PPM/degree C, 25,000 turns rotation life
Spectrol 148 pots are conductive plastic, 1,000PPM/degree C, 50,000 turns
rotation life
Spectrol 149 pots are cermet, 150PPM/degree C, 25,000 turns rotation life
Now for the kicker... Mouser does not stock 148/248 series Spectrol pots in
anything but linear taper. You want audio taper? T.S. Mr. Eliot. You will
get linear taper and you will like linear taper! But those "deer nuts" Alpha
pots are linear, audio, single, dual, and about any flavor you want. (I liked
that ... "deer nuts". Hit my funny bone.)
For controls that adjust "frequency" (VCO, filter cutoff, LFO, etc.) a nice
stable cermet pot would be better due to lower temperature coefficient. Best
would be a 10-turn wirewound pot with a temperature coefficient 1/5 that of
cermet (20 PPM).
Now the great debate... should level controls be linear taper or audio taper?
For example, should a mixer have linear pots (and possibly reversing
attenuators) or audio taper like most any other volume control on the planet? Which
do you prefer? The MOTM-830 mixer has 6 inputs. 3 of those inputs use linear
pots and are more suited to mixing of control voltages. The other 3 inputs
use audio taper pots and are more suited for audio inputs. Do you tweak by
sound or knob position? A linear pot sitting in the middle of its range is easy
to determine what voltage levels you'd see if you scoped it out. Great for
not overloading subsequent stages. But audio taper pots give a finer adjustment
at the lower ranges of signal levels (more pot travel for less change in
perceived signal level). But audio taper pots make it harder to figure out if
you'll overload subsequent stages.
If I had the money to stock up, I would go with Spectrol 248/249 series pots
and special order a boatload of audio taper pots at the values I anticipate
that I would want. That's a risky proposition, obviously. Maybe you buy some
1M audio taper conductive plastic pots for use in planned ADSR modules. After
you order them and they arrive 8 months later, you figure out that you really
wanted a voltage-controlled ADSR generator and those panel controls must be
linear taper because the taper change is the result of an exponential convertor.
Arrggh. That is one of the problems one faces with special orders.
Going the other way, I started using the Alpha pots from Mouser because I can
layout PCBs to accommodate 248-series pots, but use Alpha 24mm pots to do
things on the cheap. I can still change my mind if I pop the lottery! Besides,
the "deer nuts" 24mm Alpha pots work very well with Stooge brackets for
MOTM-format modules. That was important to me.
YMMV
Peace.
Tom Farrand
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://synth-diy.org/pipermail/synth-diy/attachments/20050826/cb1bc45c/attachment.htm>
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list