[sdiy] LM301 vs LM308 in feedforward compd filters

[harrybissell]

LOL !!!

sorry, you are not wrong !

H^) harry

Michael Ruberto wrote:

> Somebody correct me if I'm wrong but the LM308 has a slew rate many orders
> of magnitude slower than the LM301.
>
> M. A. Ruberto
>
> >From: "anthony" <aankrom at bluemarble.net>
> >To: <synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl>
> >Subject: [sdiy] LM301 vs LM308 in feedforward compd filters
> >Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 19:07:48 -0500
> >
> >I've been slowly putting together an adaptation of Juergen Haible's
> >Stormtime Flanger (when I'm not working on my Dim C clone) using 2 R5106's.
> >
> >He mentions that the filter at the input is built around an LM301 and won't
> >work with othr opamps. But I have some LM308's and it seems like these
> >/would/ work since I think they benefit from feedforward compensation like
> >the 301.
> >
> >Actually I have some of both opamps I was just wondering if there might be
> >some adavantage to using the 308 over the 301. The 301's are a lot cheaper
> >though...
> >
> >
> >aa
> >
> >