[sdiy] LM301 vs LM308 in feedforward compd filters

[Michael Ruberto]

Somebody correct me if I'm wrong but the LM308 has a slew rate many orders 
of magnitude slower than the LM301.

M. A. Ruberto

>From: "anthony" <aankrom at bluemarble.net>
>To: <synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl>
>Subject: [sdiy] LM301 vs LM308 in feedforward compd filters
>Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 19:07:48 -0500
>
>I've been slowly putting together an adaptation of Juergen Haible's 
>Stormtime Flanger (when I'm not working on my Dim C clone) using 2 R5106's.
>
>He mentions that the filter at the input is built around an LM301 and won't 
>work with othr opamps. But I have some LM308's and it seems like these 
>/would/ work since I think they benefit from feedforward compensation like 
>the 301.
>
>Actually I have some of both opamps I was just wondering if there might be 
>some adavantage to using the 308 over the 301. The 301's are a lot cheaper 
>though...
>
>
>aa
>
>