[sdiy] Op amp notes
Paul Higgins
higg0008 at tc.umn.edu
Sat Sep 4 17:34:10 CEST 2004
On Saturday, September 4, 2004, at 01:55 AM, Cary Roberts wrote:
> I don't believe in monolithic opamps for critical audio stages. I
> prefer
> the API 2520, Hardy 990, Forssell JFET992, JLM99V, Quad Eight AM10, UA
> 1108,
> etc. There was a time not too long ago when I didn't know the
> difference
> and thought a Mackie full of 4560s sounded just fine. Then again, done
> right, designs employing monolithics can still sound fine. My D&R
> Orion is
> chock full of TL074 and TL072 with a bipolar transistor pair and 5532
> for a
> mix buss and it still sounds great.
Aren't nearly all boards, regardless of price, chock full of
monolithics? I seem to recall that even SSLs have tons, likely
thousands, of 5532s in them. Not to mention what must be literally
hundreds of VCAs.
> Fred Forssell has the schematic to his original JFET opamp (same as
> Millenia
> still uses) on his website. You can also find Melcor 1731, QE AM10,
> and
> Jensen 990 (good luck making it work) schematics on the web.
I have some of that stuff archived, but haven't built any of it. It
looks interesting, though. Nelson Pass has a good article on building
discrete high-voltage opamps, too.
> See above. SSM2017 weren't bad when available, although these days you
> gotta use the SSM2019 or INA217. Neve/Focusrite used 5534s in various
> designs with great success. I actually have a little 5534 circuit with
> follower pair that is a drop in replacement for API2520 and compatible
> discretes. I can't hear much of a difference in EQ circuits but you
> can
> tell with mic pre high gain circuits.
Well, after hearing so many list members' (justifiable) frustration
over SSM's capricious policy of sudden-death discontinuation of their
parts, I try to avoid using anything from SSM. I'm kind of also to the
point where if I can't get the part from Mouser or preferably Digi-Key
(I'm in MN, where they're located), I'm not too inclined to use it.
Especially with the high minimum orders many suppliers have. Digi-Key
carries lots of Burr-Brown/TI stuff, though, which I have used. (Isn't
the INA217 a Burr-Brown part?). Interestingly, the OP-27s I've got are
from both B-B and Analog Devices. It must not be a patented part
anymore. It is quite high-performance when it comes to S/N; like I
said, I have used it (along with a FET) as a on-board guitar
pre-preamp. That's a fairly critical application; the pre-preamp feeds
a hot-rodded Mesa/Boogie Quad Preamp (among other things), which is
about as high-gain as you're going to get!
I believe you on the mic preamp applications; nearly all well-received
designs use discretes in the front-end differential stages, and it
certainly makes sense from just a S/N perspective. And then there are
the input transformer zealots...
> Other than building some Mackie-like circuits with 4560s and some
> generic
> TL0xx buffer circuits I don't have much experience using monolithics
> for
> audio. I haven't seen the need to spend time tweaking monolithics when
> building '70s vintage discrete audio designs are so much more fun.
I build a lot of stuff with tubes and hybrid circuitry, so I know what
you mean. Still, when you want to build a four-band fully parametric
EQ, etc. monolithics make life a lot easier. MHO is that monolithics
are fine in line-level circuits (as long as you don't use total junk).
Of course, I was mostly asking list members about line-level synth
applications, though I'm of course interested in pro audio uses as well.
-PRH
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list