[sdiy] Radfio Shack

[James Patchell]

That could have been done...but I think you would have had diminishing 
returns as the effective clock rate of the 6502 would have to be reduced in 
order to maintain the minimum width of phase 2 of the clock....and the 6502 
also had a minimum clock rate, since it was a dynamic, rather than a static 
CPU chip.

At 10:18 AM 10/23/2004 -0400, Glen wrote:
>At 05:37 AM 10/23/04 , Rainer Buchty wrote:
>
> >>Yeah,  but that's *way* too closely coupled for comfort for a lot of 
> uses...
>
>I seem to remember reading something about using more than two 6502 CPUs,
>along with a multiphase clock. Does anyone else remember that? I think it
>takes a bit of additional support circuitry, unlike the trick with the
>2-phase clock, which requires almost no additional circuitry.
>
>
>later,
>Glen

         -Jim
***************************************************************
http://www.oldcrows.net/~patchell

***************************************************************