[sdiy] waveform pics
jblippard at comcast.net
jblippard at comcast.net
Fri Oct 22 20:11:48 CEST 2004
Something like this is probably happening. The last time I had my Juno-106 on a scope the waveforms looked a *lot* closer to true saw and pulse/square than these shots show.
Now, if only my Juno weren't 1000 miles away, I could hook it up and take some pictures. :)
-Jonathan
-------------- Original message --------------
> Looks like a square wave that is being HP filtered...
> in fact more like passed through a too-small DC
> blocking cap
>
> H^) harry
>
>
> --- Dave Magnuson wrote:
>
> > At 11:51 AM 10/22/04, john mahoney wrote:
> >
> > > When developing MX4, I inspected the raw waves
> > of a number of
> > >synths. After the exchange this morning, I dug up
> > the original waves
> > >and with the magic of iPhoto, produced a web page
> > that compares the
> > >waves of a Prophet 5, Minimoog, Voyager, Juno 106
> > and Doepfer standard
> > >osc.
> > > Enjoy:
> > >
> >
> http://www.stretta.com/~matthew/resources/analog_waves/
> > >
> > >--
> > >john
> >
> >
> > Here's a question: is the Juno-106 square wave
> > really *THAT*
> > poor? There's no holding of the peaks at all...
> > it's more like
> > alternating positive and negative saw peaks.
> >
> > Hopefully his Juno was defective!
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > Resonant Frequency:
> > resfreq at hoohahrecords.com
> > http://www.hoohahrecords.com/resfreq/index.html
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://synth-diy.org/pipermail/synth-diy/attachments/20041022/11ddd12a/attachment.htm>
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list