[sdiy] waveform pics

jblippard at comcast.net jblippard at comcast.net
Fri Oct 22 20:11:48 CEST 2004


Something like this is probably happening.  The last time I had my Juno-106 on a scope the waveforms looked a *lot* closer to true saw and pulse/square than these shots show.

Now, if only my Juno weren't 1000 miles away, I could hook it up and take some pictures. :)

-Jonathan

-------------- Original message -------------- 

> Looks like a square wave that is being HP filtered... 
> in fact more like passed through a too-small DC 
> blocking cap 
> 
> H^) harry 
> 
> 
> --- Dave Magnuson wrote: 
> 
> > At 11:51 AM 10/22/04, john mahoney wrote: 
> > 
> > > When developing MX4, I inspected the raw waves 
> > of a number of 
> > >synths. After the exchange this morning, I dug up 
> > the original waves 
> > >and with the magic of iPhoto, produced a web page 
> > that compares the 
> > >waves of a Prophet 5, Minimoog, Voyager, Juno 106 
> > and Doepfer standard 
> > >osc. 
> > > Enjoy: 
> > > 
> > 
> http://www.stretta.com/~matthew/resources/analog_waves/ 
> > > 
> > >-- 
> > >john 
> > 
> > 
> > Here's a question: is the Juno-106 square wave 
> > really *THAT* 
> > poor? There's no holding of the peaks at all... 
> > it's more like 
> > alternating positive and negative saw peaks. 
> > 
> > Hopefully his Juno was defective! 
> > 
> > Dave 
> > 
> > Resonant Frequency: 
> > resfreq at hoohahrecords.com 
> > http://www.hoohahrecords.com/resfreq/index.html 
> > 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://synth-diy.org/pipermail/synth-diy/attachments/20041022/11ddd12a/attachment.htm>


More information about the Synth-diy mailing list