[sdiy] Simple MIDI-syncable LFO...?
Richard Wentk
richard at skydancer.com
Mon Oct 18 18:27:23 CEST 2004
At 17:57 18/10/2004 +0200, Rainer Buchty wrote:
>To bring this somewhat back on-topic: is there any good resource about
>tape data recording and the various formats/methods used, especially on
>synthesizers?
The old 300bp CUTS standard was as simple as it gets:
http://www.fact-index.com/k/ka/kansas_city_standard.html
The problem with synth hardware is that every synth had a different data
structure, and reverse engineering it would be an interesting challenge.
The most obvious thing to do would be to write a CUTS to binary translator
for WAV files - I expect someone has done this already - and then save
patches over and over changing one thing at a time.
Not quite sure what the overall point would be though, except maybe to
mount a rescue attempt on old favourite patches that are still on cassette.
>WAV files are more reliable than old program cassette tapes... Plus you
>don't have to rewind.
I think most of us use disks these days. :-)
Actually I'm surprised how few synths have hard disks built in. They're
incredibly cheap now and - if you were to build a synth round a tiny
embedded PC board running Linux - fairly easy to use.
Richard
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list