[sdiy] Telharmonium motors, perhaps? OT / Sanity Clause

[Tim Parkhurst]

LOL!!

I'll tell you, with three major projects here at work, trying to ride herd
on drawings for quotes from half a dozen different vendors, AND trying to
keep up with the bills/domestic issues at home, SDIY is about the only thing
keeping me (relatively) sane these days!

Well, SDIY and CDs from Genesis and the Aquabats...



Tim (I'll unsubscribe when they pry my mouse from my cold, dead hands) Servo

"Imagination is more important than knowledge." - Albert Einstein




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gene Stopp [mailto:gene at ixiacom.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 5:14 PM
> To: synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> Subject: RE: [sdiy] Telharmonium motors, perhaps?
> 
> You're not helping me here!!!!! I actually have a gutted keyboard case
with
> keyboard with lots of room inside waiting for something funky! Arrrg!
> 
> - Gene
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mab at linux.site [mailto:mab at linux.site]On Behalf Of Michael Baxter
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 5:10 PM
> To: Gene Stopp
> Cc: synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> Subject: RE: [sdiy] Telharmonium motors, perhaps?
> 
> 
> I like the tone wheel idea, have been fascinated by it for years. IIRC,
> The Exploratorium in San Franciso actually has one a tone wheel. They
> built one of these to show how Fourier synthesis works basically. You can
> also buy the plans for it very cheaply in their museum store.
> 
> Rather than painting on the sine waves, I got the idea later to use a
> laser printer to construct the (smaller) tone wheel with transparancy
> media.
> 
> This then leads to a motor speed controller and phase-locked loop, and
> then eventually 12 motorized speed controllers for an equal-tempered
> octave, with 12-16 VCAs per voice ...
> 
> I agree with you Gene: "must ... not ... start ... new ... projects!"
> 
> Cheers,
> Michael
> 
> 
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Gene Stopp wrote:
> 
> > Yup that's the idea, a tape recording of some waveform or another,
> speeding
> > up and slowing down. Mellotrons run at a constant 7.5 ips with the pitch
> pot
> > at center position. And they're not looped (usually).
> >
> > This idea sounds a little goofy. Many of the ideas that pop up on this
> list
> > sound a little goofy. Like using a CV to select MIDI ports, or huge
> matrices
> > for modular patch signal routing, tape head wands, tube synthesizers,
etc.
> > But they are NOT goofy! Here's why:
> >
> > a) This is a hobby, dammit
> > b) This is art, dammit
> > c) Our creations are manifestations of creativity, with a technological
> > twist
> > d) The sounds are cool too
> >
> > Seems to me the tape VCO would only be good over a couple of octaves.
The
> > portamento rate might be different depending on whether it was spinning
> fast
> > or slow in the first place. And I bet it would go through tape pretty
> fast,
> > if it's running all the time like a "normal" VCO. Be a bummer to have it
> > sitting there during a gig, and the last key you hit was the highest
note,
> > the tape inside eating itself alive...
> >
> > Maybe the optical disk would be better. Or just the tonewheel. That
would
> > sure be a heck of a lot easier to build too. You could mix the tone with
> the
> > real VCO that it's phase-locked to. You could also have two or three
> > motor-tones behind the real VCO. They would all probably have different
> > mechanical characteristics for interesting tracking effects. Also with
the
> > spinning disk idea you don't actually need a separate tach output, just
> use
> > the tone itself for the PLL compare.
> >
> > Allright this is getting out of hand. Cut it out... must... not...
> start...
> > new... projects...
> >
> >
> > - Gene
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Glen [mailto:mclilith at charter.net]
> > Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 4:02 PM
> > To: Gene Stopp; synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> > Subject: RE: [sdiy] Telharmonium motors, perhaps?
> >
> >
> > At 05:49 PM 11/22/04 , Gene Stopp wrote:
> >
> > >I think it was in an old Crowhurst book that I read about a VCO that
was
> > >actually a tape playback with the motor speed (and therefore the pitch)
> > >under voltage control.
> >
> > That sounds interesting! I bet a lot of analog lovers would be drooling
at
> > the thought of the built-in tape characteristics imparted onto the
sound.
> I
> > wonder if the speed could be changed quickly enough to build a monosynth
> > out of such an oscillator? I bet it would have its own special
> > "portamento-like" effect on each and every note, unless the motors could
> > change speeds *very* quickly. The possibility of unique pitch slurring
> > might even add to the unit's analog charm.  :)
> >
> > If such a monosynth were actually built, I would think any flanging,
> > chorusing, and distortion effects should also make use of a tape
transport
> > system. I know that Mellotrons used tape, in a sampler style, but I
don't
> > think this would be the same concept at all. You're talking about using
a
> > tape transport in the core of an oscillator, and not as a "sample
player",
> > isn't that correct?
> >
> >
> > take care,
> > Glen
> >
> >
> 
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 11/1/2004
> 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 11/1/2004
 



***************************************************************************
This message is confidential.  The information contained in
this e-mail message is intended only for confidential use of the
recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in
error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
message is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original
message.
***************************************************************************