[sdiy] presets on a modular
Paul Maddox
P.Maddox at signal.QinetiQ.com
Fri Nov 12 12:08:17 CET 2004
Don,
> The first is that they're way too complex. Whether you measure that
> by the parts count, by the cost, by the panel space, or by the time
> spent building it, the value of the patching circuitry comes in at
> several times the circuitry being patched.
Yep, and thats why I've held off, doing anything more than thinking it
through and making oodles of notes.
> The second is that the preset schemes suffer from a bad user
> interface. Remember, you're building a Musical Instrument (capital M,
> capital I), and for that a bad user interface is unacceptable.
Yep, no matter how you do it, its going to be less than ideal.
That said, many people will argue that a tonne of patch-chords is less than
ideal.
> And third, the patching schemes are all based on the awful patching
> model found on any modern computer-in-a-plastic-box keyboard, where
> arbitrary sounds are selected by a binary number. No real Musical
> Instruments use that preset model.
I struggle with this.
How many 'real musical' instruments have multiple sounds?
A piano, err no, A flute, err no, maybe a violin, err no...
So I think the need for this is different to that of a 'real musical'
instrument.
> Instead of forcing a bad preset model on an analog modular synth, I
> think it would be better to develop a new preset model that's more
> appropriate to the instrument.
Agreed, its less than ideal.
> Consider what other Musical Instruments do for presets; guitars,
guitars don't have presets?
> organs,
organs have 'ranges' that you can add/remove, again, no presets.
You can't have a 'Big juicy organ' button that turns on all the stops, you
do it manually, one (or two) at a time.
> other keyboards, etc.
define keyboard.
> Consider not trying to present any
> arbitrary set of patches and control settings. Consider better ways
> of selecting a patch than a binary number. Consider your actual
> musical needs; the sounds you want to use and how you want to go
> between them.
Agreed, there's half the trick of designing a new synth.
Paul
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list