[sdiy] oscilloscope single/dual ?

[Fernando de Izuzquiza]

Thanks to all that answered!

I see it's better to go dual channel, I see I will use 8 channels if I
could... you are right.

What I don't like is that 20MHz and up are so big and heavy...(and the
price, $285 VS $550)
But it's a trade I guess

f
*

---------  mensaje original --------
Enviado por : Scott Gravenhorst <music.maker at gte.net>
Enviado a: synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl <synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl>
Asunto: Re: [sdiy] oscilloscope single/dual ?
Fecha: 28-06-04 22:46

> I've had both dual and single trace scopes.  Dual wins by a goodly
margin.  Some things can be done with add/subtract, others are not so
easy.  Plus the add/subtract is built in on a decent dual trace, plus the
ability to trigger off of either channel.

If this is a democracy, I vote dual.

Fernando de Izuzquiza <fdi at ran.es> wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>I've seen a new scope 10MHz single channel but XY capable and screen is
>1/2 than usual (about 3''), but is about 30% size of a normal scope and
>I like that.
>I'd like some opinions about how important is to have two channels for
>SDIY... and 3'' V 6'' also.
>I can add and substract signals before the scope so, it is usual to
>compare signals or any other duty that asks for a dual channel instead
>of single?
>
>Thank you very much again,
>
>Fernando


<br><br>
Direccion.com<br>
________________________________________________<br>
This
mail was sent by Direccion.com 2.0