[sdiy] VCO reset time
Don Tillman
don at till.com
Fri Jun 4 07:24:36 CEST 2004
> Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 21:21:56 +0200
> From: Rene_Schmitz <uzs159 at uni-bonn.de>
>
> > What is a good ramp reset time ? How fast have you seen
> > ramp reset be ?
>
> Zero. (A special triangle core ;-))
> Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 00:14:30 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Magnus Danielson <cfmd at bredband.net>
>
> I consider triangular cores a very interesting concept and they
> might compete very well with sawtooth cores IMHO.
I've been questioning the whole point of sawtooth cores for a couple
years now, and I'm thinking that triangle cores are a lot better.
Here are three advantages of triangle core VCO's:
1. No reset detuning.
2. You can get each of the basic waveforms in just one step:
triangle -> saw
-> square
-> sine
With the sawtooth you need two steps to get to the sine wave (and
possibly the square wave depending upon how you want PWM to
work):
sawtooth -> triangle -> sine
-> square
3. Any glitches in the triangle-to-sawtooth conversion will be less
noticable because the sawtooth has more harmonic content to mask
them, while any glitches in the sawtooth-to-traingle conversion
will be more noticible as there is less harmonic content to mask
them.
The only advantage I can see to a sawtooth core is in visualizing the
waveshaping. That is, your waveshaping transfer function looks like
your output waveform.
Of course a trapezoid core VCO is better still. :-)
-- Don
--
Don Tillman
Palo Alto, California
don at till.com
http://www.till.com
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list