Buggy Whips [was]Re: [sdiy] Should I repair my Fostex, or should I go HD recording?
WeAreAs1 at aol.com
WeAreAs1 at aol.com
Mon Dec 27 01:19:24 CET 2004
In a message dated 12/26/04 3:57:13 PM, rude66 at xs4all.nl writes:
<< heh heh.. no disagreement there. my emu esi-32 sounds fatter that a
software
sampler. >>
Yeah! I see ESI-32's for sale every day for $100, sometimes even less! I'll
probably also pick one of them up one of these days -- how can I resist?
<< for me OS isn't really an issue, just keep using the old one.. >>
Same with me. I use OS9 on the Mac, and I will stick with it until I am
absolutely forved to upgrade. I waited to upgrade to OS9 until this year (at
least three years after they introduced OSX). I use version 3 of MOTU's Digital
Performer for sequencing and audio recording (they're up to version 4.5 now,
which is still buggy and which requires OSX), but honestly, version 2.7 worked
just as well for me -- maybe even better.
Mike B.
P.S. -- Hardware Buggy Whips are far superior to those new Virtual Buggy
Whips (VBW's). For one thing, the new ones are still way too, umm... buggy.
Horses like them better, though, for some strange reason.
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list