[sdiy] Possible New Waveform Generator Circuits

[elmacaco]

The correct form would be Falsely portraying, and I have never seen that on
this list except from you.  Come to think of it, the same is true with
psychopathic behavior.

Read your message again below.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steven J" <g546 at mailbox.co.za>
To: <synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl>
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: [sdiy] Possible New Waveform Generator Circuits


> On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 18:00:47 -0700
>  Simon Gatrall <gatrall at pacbell.net> wrote:
> > At 2:28 AM +0200 4/7/04, Steven J wrote:
> > >I have explained my ideas well in my original post,
> > though
> > >many people seem to honestly not understand them. If
> > such
> > >people can not understand what I am saying, then it is
> > >unlikely that they can help me very much, though it is
> > not
> > >impossible.
> >
> > The Synth-DIY and AH mailing lists include many, if not
> > the majority, of the people who are behind the currently
> > active companies making analog synthesizers in the world.
> >  If they can't understand you, then it is your
> > miscommunication, not theirs.  If you want their help,
> > calling people psychopaths will not get it.
> >
> > Instead of continuing this, why don't you take a deep
> > breath, relax and try to explain your original question
> > in way that it is clear.
> >
> > Also, my comment about language was not meant as an ad
> > hominem attack.  I greatly respect people who can
> > communicate in more than one language - most people here
> > in the US can't even speak one language properly let
> > alone many.  I was merely pointing out what I have seen
> > over and over on the net where someone who is unfamiliar
> > with the way that people typically communicate online can
> > often misunderstand the manner as being rude.  I see
> > certain phrases in your messages which do not sound like
> > anything from someone who has grown up with English as a
> > first language (e.g. "many of the false-portraying people
> > on this list").  There is nothing wrong with that in and
> > of itself, but if this is indeed the case, you might want
> > to think carefully about where the misunderstanding in
> > this mess may lie.
> > -- 
> > Simon Gatrall
> > gatrall at pacbell.net
>
>
> The following is a case of false portrayal in the previous
> post:
> "If you want their help, calling people psychopaths will
> not get it."
>
> I have called only the people that use psychopathic
> behaviors such as false portrayal psychopaths. I have never
> stated that anyone was a psychopath without basing it upon
> specific psychopathic behaviors.
>
> The rest of the post was adequately civilized though.
>
> I understand my original post in it's entirety easily, and
> english is my first language. It therefore seems to me that
> other people should understand it as easily too.
>
> Terms that consist of combined words, like
> 'false-portraying' have obvious meaning and are far more
> efficient and intelligent to use than their alternative- a
> long phrase which often requires a restructuring of the
> sentence in order to contain them.
> ______________________________________________________________
> Herbalife Independent Distributor http://www.healthiest.co.za


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.644 / Virus Database: 412 - Release Date: 3/26/04