[sdiy] Possible New Waveform Generator Circuits

[Scott Gravenhorst]

For all who don't know, rja at euronet.nl is the email address of Rick Jansen,
the admin of the list.

I have sent my request to have "Steven J <g546 at mailbox.co.za>" removed from
the list.  

Even after his first assault, there was a time when I would have entertained
the idea of his question, however, I am no longer interested due to his
abusive attitude.

He reminds me of Bjorn Nillson AKA Adolph Amin in some ways, but this Steven
J moron is far worse and not nearly as entertaining; I'd gladly take Bjorn in
his place.  And Bjorn didn't need to be ejected, he left on his own.

I now believe that he had nothing whatever valuable to offer this list and
that his idea is nothing profound and not worth any of our time.

"J. Larry Hendry" <jlarryh at iquest.net> wrote:
>OK.  I've had enough.  Steven, don't bother to answer.  I have added you to
>my block senders list.  ALL of your posts are completely off topic.  And,
>reposting a private mail to the e-mail list to try to make your point is
>inexcusable.
>
>RICK,  Please kick this childish moron off the list !!!!!
>
>Steve,  Just go away !  No one here would help you now even if they knew the
>answers you wanted because of your behavior.  Pick up a few good books like
>Dale Carnegie.  Come back when you reach adulthood.
>
>Larry Hendry
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Steven J <g546 at mailbox.co.za>
>To: <synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl>
>Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 4:56 PM
>Subject: Re: [sdiy] Possible New Waveform Generator Circuits
>
>
>On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 15:16:39 -0500
> Studio 271 Productions <studio271 at ev1.net> wrote:
>> PRIVATE:
>>
>> Are you purposely causing problems on the list? I'm not
>> at all being aggressive here or calling you anything, but
>> why are you acting so childish in regards to people
>> trying to help you? Many of the people on the list have
>> already given up on you because of your arrogance to them
>> when they asked for further explanation of your question,
>> i.e.:
>>
>> // I understand my original post in it's entirety easily,
>> and
>> // english is my first language. It therefore seems to me
>> that
>> // other people should understand it as easily too.
>>
>> That is a very degrading comment to most people; many of
>> the people here have EE degrees and are very intelligent.
>> The fact that they could not understand what you were
>> trying to ask does not, in the eyes of lurkers on the
>> list (like me), point to the problem being on their part.
>> I'm quite sure that you have nobody on this list on your
>> side in this argument over who was
>> ignoring/insulting/degrading who.
>>
>> I have read with great interest (not on the technical
>> aspects, but the social aspects) all of your recent posts
>> to the list, and I must say that you are not presenting
>> yourself with a very naive atmosphere in a list where you
>> should be doing so. Many people have replied trying to
>> honestly ask for further effort on your part in regards
>> to the original question, but you have chosen to take it
>> offensively and label them, in your mind, as stupid,
>> simply because they don't know what you are saying.
>>
>> Again, I must say that I have no offense towards you in
>> this post and that you must either stop posting and save
>> an administrator the effort of eventually removing you
>> from the list or at least understand that they have
>> already answered your question based on assumptions, not
>> the information you have supplied. Any further posts
>> regarding the people on this list obviously show that you
>> are not a socially responsible person and do not realize
>> when and where you should not stand up for yourself. As a
>> tip, I'll tell you that this is one of those times and
>> places, ok?
>>
>> I don't mean to be condescending in this post, but it
>> certainly shows you how most people on this list feel
>> like talking to you. From your reactions, I must again
>> say that you are acting very childish in regards to this
>> whole thing and that you should really stop being so
>> pompous in your posts. Most of the people on this list
>> have chosen to just ignore you in hopes that you will
>> give up and leave, but I just don't see you doing that so
>> I decided to explain to you the situation in the
>> preceding.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> -Drew
>>
>> p.s. - I am no way insulting you in this post, so please
>> take this to heart and delete the message when you are
>> done. It just isn't good etiquette to keep posting
>> people's private messages on a public system; a bit like
>> playing answering machine messages over the radio.
>>
>
>The preceeding post was sent to me personally by Studio
>271. It falsely portrays me as 'purposely causing
>problems', 'very childish', 'arrogant', 'pompous', and 'not
>socially responsible', and furthermore it states, in a
>clear contradiction, that it is not condescending or
>offensive. I am therefore socially obliged to display it to
>the public, so that people know what Studio 271 has been
>doing. The irony of the accusation of 'purposely causing
>problems' is that that is precisely what false portrayal
>is, and I am trying to correct the problems by exposing
>them.
>
>Also, I have never stated that people that do not
>understand my original post are stupid.
>
>"It just isn't good etiquette to keep posting people's
>private messages on a public system" -That is an ironic
>statement, as it is not good etiquette to send private
>emails to people that contain false portrayal. It is
>socially responsible to display them to the public, so that
>people know of such actions.
>
>Studio 271- I demand that you, and everyone else on this
>list, do not harass me with private emails that falsely
>portray my character.
>
>As long as I am posting, I will point out another case of
>false portrayal, so that no one will be fooled by it:
>"This ranting about "false portrayal"
>and psychopaths is tiresome and uninteresting."
>(-by Scott Gravenhorst, I think)
>
>-This falsely portrays the necessary act of exposing
>malicious deceptions as a rant. Also, it is the false
>portrayal itself that is tiresome.
>______________________________________________________________
>Herbalife Independent Distributor http://www.healthiest.co.za
>
>

=========================================================  
- Where merit is not rewarded, excellence fades.
- Hydrogen is pointless without solar.
- What good are laws that only lawyers understand?
- The media's credibility should always be questioned.
- The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist.
- Governments do nothing well, save collect taxes.

-- Scott Gravenhorst | LegoManiac / Lego Trains / RIS 1.5
-- Linux Rex         | RedWebMail by RedStarWare
-- FatMan: home1.gte.net/res0658s/FatMan/
-- NonFatMan: home1.gte.net/res0658s/electronics/
-- Autodidactic Master of Arcane and Hidden Knowledge.