[sdiy] Possible New Waveform Generator Circuits

[Steven J]

On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 15:16:39 -0500
 Studio 271 Productions <studio271 at ev1.net> wrote:
> PRIVATE:
>
> Are you purposely causing problems on the list? I'm not
> at all being aggressive here or calling you anything, but
> why are you acting so childish in regards to people
> trying to help you? Many of the people on the list have
> already given up on you because of your arrogance to them
> when they asked for further explanation of your question,
> i.e.:
>
> // I understand my original post in it's entirety easily,
> and
> // english is my first language. It therefore seems to me
> that
> // other people should understand it as easily too.
>
> That is a very degrading comment to most people; many of
> the people here have EE degrees and are very intelligent.
> The fact that they could not understand what you were
> trying to ask does not, in the eyes of lurkers on the
> list (like me), point to the problem being on their part.
> I'm quite sure that you have nobody on this list on your
> side in this argument over who was
> ignoring/insulting/degrading who.
>
> I have read with great interest (not on the technical
> aspects, but the social aspects) all of your recent posts
> to the list, and I must say that you are not presenting
> yourself with a very naive atmosphere in a list where you
> should be doing so. Many people have replied trying to
> honestly ask for further effort on your part in regards
> to the original question, but you have chosen to take it
> offensively and label them, in your mind, as stupid,
> simply because they don't know what you are saying.
>
> Again, I must say that I have no offense towards you in
> this post and that you must either stop posting and save
> an administrator the effort of eventually removing you
> from the list or at least understand that they have
> already answered your question based on assumptions, not
> the information you have supplied. Any further posts
> regarding the people on this list obviously show that you
> are not a socially responsible person and do not realize
> when and where you should not stand up for yourself. As a
> tip, I'll tell you that this is one of those times and
> places, ok?
>
> I don't mean to be condescending in this post, but it
> certainly shows you how most people on this list feel
> like talking to you. From your reactions, I must again
> say that you are acting very childish in regards to this
> whole thing and that you should really stop being so
> pompous in your posts. Most of the people on this list
> have chosen to just ignore you in hopes that you will
> give up and leave, but I just don't see you doing that so
> I decided to explain to you the situation in the
> preceding.
>
> Best regards,
> -Drew
>
> p.s. - I am no way insulting you in this post, so please
> take this to heart and delete the message when you are
> done. It just isn't good etiquette to keep posting
> people's private messages on a public system; a bit like
> playing answering machine messages over the radio.
>

The preceeding post was sent to me personally by Studio
271. It falsely portrays me as 'purposely causing
problems', 'very childish', 'arrogant', 'pompous', and 'not
socially responsible', and furthermore it states, in a
clear contradiction, that it is not condescending or
offensive. I am therefore socially obliged to display it to
the public, so that people know what Studio 271 has been
doing. The irony of the accusation of 'purposely causing
problems' is that that is precisely what false portrayal
is, and I am trying to correct the problems by exposing
them.

Also, I have never stated that people that do not
understand my original post are stupid.

"It just isn't good etiquette to keep posting people's
private messages on a public system" -That is an ironic
statement, as it is not good etiquette to send private
emails to people that contain false portrayal. It is
socially responsible to display them to the public, so that
people know of such actions.

Studio 271- I demand that you, and everyone else on this
list, do not harass me with private emails that falsely
portray my character.

As long as I am posting, I will point out another case of
false portrayal, so that no one will be fooled by it:
"This ranting about "false portrayal"
and psychopaths is tiresome and uninteresting."
(-by Scott Gravenhorst, I think)

-This falsely portrays the necessary act of exposing
malicious deceptions as a rant. Also, it is the false
portrayal itself that is tiresome.
______________________________________________________________
Herbalife Independent Distributor http://www.healthiest.co.za