[sdiy] Possible New Waveform Generator Circuits

[Rude 66]

steven, steven, steven...

it's actually quite funny to see someone digging their own grave (in a
figure of speech, of course) so quickly. a lot of people here are on AH as
well, calling them psychopaths and nitpickers won't really help you..like it
dodn't help you there.. as you can see your reputation is building
quickly..;-)..



----- Original Message -----
From: "Simon Gatrall" <gatrall at pacbell.net>
To: <synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl>
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 4:35 AM
Subject: Re: [sdiy] Possible New Waveform Generator Circuits


> For the benefit of fellow SDIY'ers let me summarize:
>
> >furthermore there were several psychopaths on the list that strongly
> >libeled me because I did not fulfill nitpicking requests
>
> I read your post on AH and like many other people there I have a
> pretty good familiarity with various synthesis methods and the
> history of electronic music.  I also have a company which makes
> electronic music equipment.  In other words, I should be able to at
> least follow your preamble, even if I can't follow your awkward ASCII
> schematics.  However, the following paragraph makes little sense to
> me, and evidently, many other people with far more years of
> electronics experience than mine:
>
> >There is a way to drastically alter a waveform in a
> >very simple fashion in such a way that the waveform
> >remains nearly as smooth as a sine wave. That method of
> >alteration is to successively increase, or successively
> >decrease, the size of a wave from the beginning of the
> >waveform to it's end, thus resulting in an outward
> >spiraling waveform or an inward spiraling waveform,
> >respectively. These modifications are made to each of the 2
> >arcs of the sine wave cycle. I have asked about such
> >waveforms on multiple mailing lists, and no one is
> >familiar with them. I am surprised that such waveforms are
> >not already common, considering how basic they are.
>
> If you can provide some sort of explanation of what that gobbledegook
> is supposed to mean, perhaps by posting some diagrams on the net
> somewhere, maybe people will be willing to help you, but if all you
> can do is get mad at other people when you are the one that seems to
> have trouble communicating, well... of course they're going to get
> irritated.
>
> >_______________________________________________________
> >Herbalife Independent Distributor www.healthiest.co.za
>
> I didn't notice this sig the first time around, but it certainly
> detracts from any credibility this guy is trying to court here.
>
> Herbalife is a massive scam:
>
> http://cockeyed.com/workfromhome/workfromhome_s.html
>
> --
> Simon Gatrall
> gatrall at pacbell.net
>