[sdiy] Scanner Vibrato emulation, first results
The Peasant
epeasant at telusplanet.net
Thu May 22 05:38:35 CEST 2003
Quoting harrybissell <harrybissell at prodigy.net>:
> well if Grant Richter is a genius,
> ...then what is Juergen Haible ???
Proto-god, IMHO.
> (Of course he could have gotten the same results with a
> BBD :^P)
Ha! New BBDs are available again! Look out Harry, we're
going to get you now! Attack of the killer BBDs!!!
Take care,
Doug
> H^) harry
>
> Glen wrote:
>
> > At 09:07 PM 5/21/03 , Scott Juskiw wrote:
> > >Just for fun, I made a quick recording of my ham'n
> playing the same
> > >notes/stops through the same sequence: dry, C1, C2,
> C3, V1, V2, V3.
> > >If anything, the real thing sounds rougher (quite a
> bit more grundge):
> > >
> > >http://www.tellun.com/snd/hammond_chorus_vibrato.mp3
> > >
> > >Straight out, no leslie, no reverb, no synthesizers,
> no.
> >
> > I've listened to all the recordings so far, and all of
> them exhibit
> > distortion from clipping. I also noticed that jhaible
> used reverb on his
> > "dry" organ sample, and that Scott did not. I then
> started wondering what
> > sort of recording technique was used in both cases.
> >
> > Did you fellows record with a microphone, or tap into
> the Hammond directly
> > for your recordings? I think we need to use the same
> approach for the best
> > comparison.
> >
> > I don't have a Hammond "B3-style" organ here at home,
> but I do have some
> > Hammond vibrato scanners. I'll see what sort of scanner
> demo I can put
> > together, just for reference. I don't plan on using a
> microphone. I intend
> > to record directly from the equipment itself, to
> eliminate any differences
> > attributable to mics or speakers.
> >
> > Oh, I wanted to say that the jhaible recordings were
> very interesting. I
> > think they are getting close to the traditional Hammond
> scanner sound.
> >
> > later,
> > Glen Berry
>
>
______________________
The Electronic Peasant
www.electronicpeasant.com
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list