[sdiy] Patch documentation: more thoughts
Tim Ressel
madhun2001 at yahoo.com
Wed Jul 2 01:56:48 CEST 2003
I was going to start with the method used in
Polyphony: Show the connexions with a block diagram,
then use prose to talk about settings.
--TR
--- Peter Grenader <pgrenader at mksound.com> wrote:
> Another thing to keep in mind --> what part of the
> patch is absolutely
> required in order to document it. For instance, the
> sonic path may be real
> important - but do you HAVE to jot down whether it's
> a sequencer or
> arpeggiator controlling the freq of the VCO?
> Probably not.
>
> I've found that limiting documentation to the
> 'criitical path', it saves a
> lot of time and hassle.
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list