[sdiy] NIC-based wave folder/shaper
harrybissell at prodigy.net
harrybissell at prodigy.net
Mon Jan 27 18:08:29 CET 2003
Agreed... the bounding circuit would be better... but I thought
it might also be more complex because most of these use the negative
feedback path... and in the NIC there are two feedback paths.
Brute force bounding of the output could work... I'd still try
the power supply pins first beacuse of the simplicity of it.
The higher frequencies might not matter anyway... old arguement of the
harmonics being above human hearing anyway...
H^) harry
--------Original Message--------
From: jhaible at debitel.net
To: harrybissell <harrybissell at prodigy.net>
Cc: Ian Fritz <ijfritz at earthlink.net>, synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
Sent: Jan 27 2003 12:36
Subject: Re: [sdiy] NIC-based wave folder/shaper
Sent: Jan 27 2003 12:36
Subject: Re: [sdiy] NIC-based wave folder/shaper
>
>> I think this circuit begs to have a tracking bipolar supply
>> connected to the opamp so you can vary the point at which
>> the opamp saturates....
>Or for a bounding circuit which allows the opamp output to
>be clipped without the opamp being saturated. It might
>make a difference with high pitched input signals.
>JH.
>-------------------------------------------------
>debitel.net Webmail
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Powered by Wild On Web:
Free POP Mail Access - Access your E-mail from Anywhere in the World!
http://www.wildonweb.com
|Awards|Money|Bank|Credit|Dating|Games|Jokes|Vitamins|Magazines|Diet|
|Bookstore|News|Babies|Cards|Homepages|Hobbies|...
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list