[sdiy] Moog Waveform Variation

[Mike Peake]

Direct link:

http://www.pacificnet.net/~peake/assets/2496Saws.aif

Link to files overview:

http://www.pacificnet.net/~peake/assets/


This won't play in most systems so open it in a
24/96 -friendly format.


At 9:10 PM +0100 12/31/03, Magnus Danielson wrote:
>
>
>The kind of tool which is best suited for measuring and quantifying existing
>instruments and synthesized responces is not in wide use in the music related
>engineering. Short snippets of the waveform may not be sufficient for a good
>analysis and is not the recommended method. If jitter and wander (really
>phase-deviations of various frequencies) is indeed the factor here, then we
>should use the wealth of theoretical modeling, measurement and 
>analysis methods
>being at hand.

Note that even with two seconds of each waveform,
the Moog exhibits more variation cycle-to-cycle
than the Selector. Zoom all the way out and you
should be able to see that the Moog recording is
less uniform than the Technosaurus; there is a
visible amount of difference.

This of course matters more with more than one
oscillator present.

Easier,
-- 
Mike Peake, Your Postwar Administrator

_______________________________

Specifications:

"I heard the Objective/Subjective problem is for schizoid personalities only.

Imagine if you were a baby, brought into the world only to
find crazies rambling about their own madness.

Another day for black humour."

Ison, TGS