[sdiy] scope or DMM first?, was:A Frequency Standard for Poor People?

[Magnus Danielson]

From: Ingo Debus <debus at cityweb.de>
Subject: [sdiy] scope or DMM first?, was:A Frequency Standard for Poor People?
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 16:59:36 +0100
Message-ID: <58145A84-323C-11D8-B1C6-000A9571C136 at cityweb.de>

> 
> Am Donnerstag, 18.12.03 um 22:17 Uhr schrieb Magnus Danielson:
> 
> > Harry, I *DONT* disagree with you... I really mean that most usefull 
> > DIY
> > requires BOTH a DMM and a scope, but if I must put an order on what to 
> > get
> > when, going from zilch, nada, nothingness I think a DMM get people just
> > building kits and who have good advice around above the surface,
> 
> 
> Ehm... I got my scope much much earlier than my first DMM. I fact I 
> still didn't own a DMM when I got my second scope.
> 
> Of course I had an analog multimeter long before I got my first scope...

Analog multimeter or Digital multimeter does not matter as much most of the
times... but if you nitpick it does... you need a multimeter regardless and
should get one, OK?

> Ingo (feeling old now - hey I'm only 45)

What can we do to get you feeling young again? ;O)

Cheers,
Magnus - with evil plans!