SV: SV: [sdiy] A book about analogue synthesizer circuits?
Michael Zacherl
sdiy-mz01 at arsprototo.at
Fri Apr 4 12:43:40 CEST 2003
Hej Thomas,
Thomas Kahn wrote:
> As I see it there are two major reasons for doing it this way:
>
> 1) I think it appeals to people that are into DIY electronics. First get
> your hands dirty, listen and toy around with the thing you have just
> built. This in turn will hopefully create a deeper curiosity for the
> circuit and the theroy behind it and there you have the next step in the
> book waiting to be read.
I like the idea - since it also would attract
people who prefer to build kits and also would
give them a chance to further dig into it (as you
say above).
Maybe such people could be even more attracted
with a reference to existing PCB designs and the
possibility to obtain PCBs from the respective
authors?
But what would be the significant difference in
detail to, let's say, a VCO article from Elektor?
IMHO it's quite important to have some added value
in order not to get "yet another synth DIY book".
For instance I'd find it also very intriguing to
explain existing vintage designs with respect to
why they sound as they sound.
E.g. why not take a Ladder VCF and explain the
difference between a diode ladder and one with
transistors?
Why prefer some people to clone certain classics
(eg. Pauls PPG VCO) - what makes the sound so
special. We have living examples among us :-)))
Again, we can find many of such discussions in the
SDIY archives.
> Some
> get a kick out of drawing schematics but get bored when it's time to
> realize them, others jump head first into the soldering and don't care
> much for the theory behind the circuit.
Well, if you look at the folks here we got a lot
of quite different personalities.
And IMHO this would be a chance to get some nice
synergy effects which is a chance to make this
works even more attractive!
cheers,
Michael.
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list