[sdiy] Walsh Generator & demo board
Scott Gravenhorst
music.maker at gte.net
Thu Mar 14 10:57:02 CET 2002
I just looked at it again and I notice that if you
power the CMOS parts at +/- 9v (or less), the CMOS
outputs become bipolar. Then, a simple pot from
the CMOS buffer output to ground forms a voltage
divider that then outputs the bipolar signal
at any level. The pot could be a VCA instead to
allow voltage control. Doing it this way eliminates
the 4 opamps, and all the resistors and at least
most of the DC offset. If one of the regulators for
this is adjustable, the remaining offset should be
easily eliminated. I imagine that +/- 9 v should
also work for the opamp.
Also, I would not use 4049 or 4050, as a buffer, rather
I would use the 4069.
So if the Walsh generator you have is CMOS based, this
may work for you and simplify it.
Tim Ressel <madhun2001 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>Tony,
>
>What I did was to "borrow" the summation scheme from
>Scott Gravenhorst's Complex Waveform Generator for the
>Paia Fatman. It seems to work just fine. A coupling
>cap on the output takes care of the DC offset.
>
>http://machines.hyperreal.org/manufacturers/Paia/Fatman/mods/complex.waveform.generator.gif
>--TR --- Tony Allgood <oakley at techrepairs.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>> Hi Tim and All,
>It takes a clock in, and produces 15 sin
>and cos Walsh functions. I am
>considering offering it for sale, along with a
>little demo PCB which has a 8 (or more?)
>input mixer for summing the Walsh functions. First thing
>that you should know is that the walsh
>outputs need to be bipolar. Or at least mixed
>in a fashion so as not to allow the sumnation
>of the wal outputs to affect the DC offset. So just
>
>summing TTL type square waves wrt ground is not going to work
>
>properly. Second thing, is that the mixer should be a
>
>reversible attenuator type. Many types of waveforms,
>symmetrical ones about OV IIRC, use some inversed wal
>outputs. Third thing is that for bass notes to take on any
>
>real power you really need 31 walsh outputs. I found 15
>not as interesting and a little 'electronic'.
>But you know the biggest problem with any walsh bank is not
>the generation of the walsh series.
>This can be done pretty simply with about
>eight or so cheap HCT chips. The problem is mixing them, and
>
>controlling the pitch over a decent musical range.
>Still think that all of this needs to be done in
> software as a virtual synth.
> > Regards,
> > Tony Allgood Penrith, Cumbria,
> > England
> > Oakley Sound Systems
> www.oakleysound.com
>
>Modular projects
> www.oakleysound.com/projects.htm
=========================================================
- Government: The other religion.
- The media's credibility should always be questioned.
- Lambs who lie down with lions are lunch.
-- Scott Gravenhorst | LegoManiac / Lego Trains / RIS 1.5
-- Linux Rex | RedWebMail by RedStarWare
-- FatMan: home1.GTE.NET/res0658s/FatMan/index.html
-- NonFatMan: home1.GTE.NET/res0658s/electronics/index.html
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list