[sdiy] Data transfer?
chris.crosskey at vicon.com
Thu Aug 15 09:50:28 CEST 2002
I'd suggest you talk to Paul Maddox,
He's done all this sort of stuff in his Monowave design already I
think....what you'd want is a Monowave oscialltor section in a box....but
you might as well go an dbuy a whole one as you get a Moog VCF and the truly
awesome VCA that I helped design :-)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The Proteus [mailto:proteus at ugwarehouse.org]
> Sent: 15 August 2002 08:02
> To: Synthesizer DIY List
> Subject: Re: [sdiy] Data transfer?
> Well, I don't want to get bogged down into a lot of file format
> stuff - that's what's making any type of downloadability or
> programmability such a deterrant to me, but to have this nice dual
> oscillator sitting in front of me (as a user), with up to 256 wave
> segments and programmable crossfade between each segment and no way to
> customize and store my own presets (yes, the evil word) just gets me.
> It seems that this could be split into two separate lines of
> 1. How does one design a successful, simple, modular-style
> (buttons and
> knobs) user interface for such a complicated beast?
> 2. Is it desirable, and if so, what medium would be
> appropriate for preset
> interchange in the box.
> To whet people's appetites, here's roughly what I've got planned:
> - Dual Wavetable VCO that will support from 1 to 256 waveforms in
> a single sequence.
> - Fits in a SynthTech 2U or 3U module (pending Paul's permission... I
> haven't asked yet if it's okay to defile his analog domain
> with digital
> interpolation!) :-)
> - Standard Gate / Trigger / CV in for note on and ADSR, as
> well as Linear
> FM input, Wavetable sweep, and Wavetable trigger
> - Unit can be configured as either a Dual mono or single
> stereo VCO, with
> CV in for pan control in mono mode.
> Beyond that, I've got a laundry list three pages
> long. :-) Architecturally, there will be a pretty simple CPU
> controlling a
> custom interpolator chip I'm designing which has a large
> amount of SDRAM
> hanging off of it. The CPU will also be responsible for
> converting the CV
> and gate signals and interfacing to the front panel. If I'm really
> interested in taking the time to do so, and the CPU I pick
> has an onboard
> UART I just might squeeze in a MIDI to CV converter as well.
> See below for replies.
> - - - T h e U n d e r g r o u n d W a r e h o u s e - - -
> - - - Subversive - Tools - For - A - Chaotic - Planet - - -
> - h t t p : / / w w w . u g w a r e h o u s e . o r g / -
> --<T h e P r o t e u s>-<Musician>-<Producer>-<Engineer>--
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Byron G. Jacquot wrote:
> > You might want a CV input for the wave crossfade...then a
> sequence of
> > crossfades could come from MIDI-CV, or any other modules.
> I'd like to be
> > able to tweak it with an ADSR, at the very least.
> Already on the list. What good is a modular wavetable
> oscillator when you
> can't tweak wavetable crossings?
> > Smartmedia is relatively easy to implement with a
> microcontroller...at least
> > to some degree. The problem is that it want's to be
> written with a DOS
> > FAT-12 file system. All of the desktop interfaces will
> probably prevent you
> > from doing direct block-level reads/writes.
> Yeah... this is the crux of doing anything such as CompactFlash,
> SmartMedia, and the like. The biggest problem for me is
> writing the host
> PC application if you want to transfer wave sequences between
> the modular
> and PC, or if you want to design a patch on the PC. Best bet
> for me would
> be to do a SoundDiver adaptation. :-) I have been naively
> toying with the
> idea of using a Cypress Semiconductor 8051 based USB
> controller, then hook
> the thing up via USB, but once again the host application is the
> hinderance here... I don't want to spend 4 months writing a
> damn Windows
> and MacOS app to talk to an oscillator.
> > There are some small 8-pin DIP EEPROMS that use a 3-wire
> interface. You
> > could make data cartridges around them, then build a small
> burning station,
> > maybe RS232 to 3-wire...something akin to an EPROM burner or the old
> > Oberheim Prommer. Or is that too close to a Synergy?
> Cool idea, but once again the host interface issue is blocked
> by writing a
> host app. Maybe it would be best to just have MIDI->CV on
> this box and do
> controller and sysex to it. Hrm.
> Regards and thanks,
This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in
error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the
information in any way, and notify me immediately.
More information about the Synth-diy