[sdiy] Bypass caps: Tantalum or Ceramic?
patchell
patchell at silcom.com
Fri Aug 16 00:06:14 CEST 2002
They actually do two different jobs. You want for the most part a
cap that has good high frequency performance. For this, you need a
ceramic cap, generally between .01uF to .1uF (I use .1uF).
Now, you should also have, in general, a couple of good low
frequency bypass caps on the board as well. I generally ignore this,
but still....
Tantalum caps have their own set of problems, as compared to
aluminum electrolytics. Tants seem to have a nasty habit of
spontaineously shorting sometimes. Not very often, but enough that it
can be anoying. Al Electrolytics have the nasty habbit of drying out
when there is a lot of heat. I have experienced this as well. Of
course, these are just my opinions....
Jim Johnson wrote:
> So what do most folks prefer for bypass caps: tantalum or ceramic?
>
> Jim Johnson
> Metaphoric Software
> -------------------
> Makers of Techno Toys
> Software for Electronic Music
> http://www.technotoys.com
> info at technotoys.com
--
-Jim
------------------------------------------------
* Visit:http://www.silcom.com/~patchell/
*-----------------------------------------------
*I'm sure glad Merry Christmas comes just once a year
* -Yogi Yorgensen
------------------------------------------------
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list