[sdiy] linearize OTA for VCF?
UrosM
urosuros at bitsyu.net
Sun Sep 9 15:28:21 CEST 2001
Hi JH ( and the rest )
"jh." wrote:
>
> > I was just thinking that since so many people seem to believe that the
> > distortion in the Moog ladder sounds good, why doesn't anyone talk about
> > distortion in OTA-based designs?
>
> I did, so often that I hesitate to do it all again. Half of my
> SSM2040-related
> posts must be about distortion. I don't want to be a pain. (;->)
>
> JH.
Actually , I found reference only in your first posting about 2040
( after painful search trough archive ),
direct quote :
>> and here are some details that I think are
>>important for the SSM2040 sound:
>>(1) A minimum (for a ota/buffer filter) of pn junctions in the signal
>>path,
>>due to a very minimalistic ota topology: the ota just consists of
>>a differential pair and one single current mirror.
>>(2) The very special distortion scheme, due to the same minimalistic
>>ota topology: The ota output can only swing into the positive
>>direction. The buffer is a npn darlington, so levels are shifted
>>by approx. -1.4V, so you get a very unsymmetrical clipping
>>at the output. This, together with the frequency-selective distortion
>>of the ota-inputs, gives a very unique overdrive charactersitic.
OK , that's about distortion , but I found two more interesting
topics in archive during the search . First , you mentioned
experiments about using 3096 as OTA cell , but I haven't found any
conclusive report on that topic in archive . Second ( maybe even more
important ) you mentioned doing research on unmatched pairs in 2040
gm cells . Again , no more reference about that in archive . Do you
remember anything about these and what were the results ( compared
to your discrete matched version )?
regards
urosh
yeah , one more thing : does anyone know where any linearisation
scheme used inside 3320's gm cells ( since people hate to overdrive
these things )?
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list