[sdiy] top octave gneration
Theo
t.hogers at home.nl
Wed Nov 21 09:00:54 CET 2001
As I suggested earlier;
you can do that with a AVR.
Or rather 12 AVRs that are also the dividers.
Theo
Cross tread remark:
PIC have other applications ;)
From: Don Tillman <don at till.com>
> Brock Russell wrote:
>
> > Just happen to have the 9 bit top octave divide list on my desk.
> > (2 MHz typical input)
> > Equal tempered scale; a few Just scales from Vanessa Else (Polyphony May
84)
> > C (hi) 239 210 360 630 24
> > B 253 224 384 672 26
> > A# 268 240 400 720 27
> > A 284 252 432 756 28
> > G# 301 270 450 810 30
> > G 319 280 480 840 32
> > F# 338 330 512 900 33
> > F 358 315 540 945 36
> > E 379 336 576 1008 39
> > D# 402 360 600 1080 40
> > D 426 378 640 1120 42
> > C# 451 405 675 1225 44
> > C (lo) 478 420 720 1260 48
>
> I'm sure I've said it a couple times before whenever the topic of top
octave
> generators comes up, but it's been a while...
>
> The divide-by-239 to divide-by-478 is the classic top octave chip, like
the
> 5024. It has roughly twice the error of the gear-based Hammond organ tone
> generator (that's 1938 technology!)
>
> The reason is that instead of a 1/N approach the Hammond uses a pair of
gears
> for each note, and thus an M/N approach, which gives you bettter accuracy
with
> smallish integers.
>
> This suggests a couple things. One is that you might want to aim for
better
> accuracy than a 1938 organ. Another is that it might be fun to copy the
Hammond
> ratios exactly with twelve 4046 PLLs and 24 dividers.
>
> -- Don
>
> --
> Don Tillman
> Palo Alto, California, USA
> don at till.com
> http://www.till.com
>
>
>
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list