[sdiy] Re: Replying

[Scott Gravenhorst]

Ok, if I have to vote, I would leave it the way it is.

The reasons are exactly what Paul writes below.  And I am
a convert.  Yes, it's a bit of a pain to copy and paste the
address, but as said, it makes you think.  And we are a list
of thinkers, are we not?

Paul Perry <pfperry at melbpc.org.au> wrote:
>At 11:09 AM 25/01/01 -0800, Lava Moho Disco wrote:
>
>>And who cares if it safeguards against accidentally replying to the list.
>>That is a ridiculous reason to configure the list this way.  Just be more
>>careful.
>>
>At least half the posts on this list (like this one) are off-topic.
>So any move that results in people having to think abt whether or not to
>reply to the whole list is good.
>
>I think it's probably time to take a vote on this.
>I think numbers will be against me, but I still thnk for once a vote is
>a good idea. 
>
>Of course, the long suffering and much appreciated list maintainers are free
>to do whatever they think!
>
>paul perry melbourne australlia
>

-- Scott Gravenhorst : LegoManiac / Lego Trains / RIS 1.5
-- Linux Rex, Linux Vobiscum  |  RedWebMail by RedStarWare
-- FatMan: www.teklab.com/~chordman
-- NonFatMan: members.xoom.com/_XMCM/chordman/index.html