[sdiy] RE: Oh I wish I had never said that...

Magnus Danielson cfmd at swipnet.se
Fri Jan 26 00:38:40 CET 2001


From: Martin Czech <czech at Micronas.Com>
Subject: RE: Oh I wish I had never said that...
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 10:07:13 +0100 (MET)

> SNIPPED
>  
> :::*we* are the weirdos, collecting old moogs and building our own analogue 
> :::stuff, and in that sense, we are closer in spirit to audiophiles using 
> :::high-end separates to play their vinyl collections than we are to the likes 
> :::of norman cook or the chemical brothers who happen to have appropriated some 
> :::of our favourite sounds for their dreadful output.
> 
> Yes. Because we build audio circuits starting maybe with the age of 14,
> we are able to tell the difference between an analog filter and it's
> digital clone. Because we are used to listen to timbre.
> And we know how to turn knobs to make the difference striking.
> 
> This was my greatest surprise in this respect:
> Traditional trained musicians are very often not able to hear
> what I can hear. They are very good in analysinfg chords and 
> lines e.g. from a record, but sound or timbre is something they
> are not so good at.

This is frightening, I can't really tell the diffrence between
filters, I mean, I can't just spot out "Moog", "EMS", "ARP"
etc... guess I've been too bussy learning other things... like
spotting it on a schematic...

> But I think the differences we are talking about  are generally
> more obvious than CD players and audiophile CD playes (with
> chilled CDs from the fridge, if you know what I mean).

I assume that you mean that the aluminium or gold foil will be child
into the level that they can remain in superconducting state
throughout one song. Right?

Cheers,
Magnus




More information about the Synth-diy mailing list