[sdiy] OT: Software 'theft'
harry
harrybissell at prodigy.net
Tue Feb 20 05:24:19 CET 2001
My HO...
If the software is useful to you you should buy it... If it is not useful you
should not.
I'm more likely to buy less expensive software...
I will "try" any software for free, pirate or not. A free trial is a reasonable
expectation...
and not just a crippleware copy. I do agree with full - time limited versions.
If you like, buy. If it sucks (ah... way too often) erase it.
I agree... time for this thread to go to bed !!!
H^) harry
Colin Fraser wrote:
> Imagine someone invented a matter duplicator.
> Two large boxes, one a super high-res 3d x-ray scanner, and the other a
> sub-atomic matter manipulator.
> You put any object in one box, press a button, and a short time later, an
> exact replica of the object appears - constructed from some dense source
> material, just protons, neutrons, electrons - reorganised into an identical
> copy of the original object.
> All powered by totally free cold-fusion generators.
>
> Now, what would you do with this device ?
> How many people using the matter duplicator to run themselves off a Ferrari,
> a luxury yacht, a couple of Memorymoogs ;-) etc are going to stop and
> think - 'Hey - I'm stealing someone's intellectual property here ! Someone
> invested time and money in the design of these things, aside from the cost
> of the raw materials.'
>
> The 'thief' thinks he could never have afforded to buy a real Ferrari, so
> copying one for himself can't possibly hurt the maker.
>
> The maker thinks their design is being 'stolen'.
>
> Neither party is wholly right, neither is totally wrong.
> The debate will no doubt go on forever.
> But hopefully not here...
>
> Colin f
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list