A more complex MIDI-DIN Sync convertor?

[Jim Patchell]

    The main thing that made me pick the AVR was the instruction set.  Even
though I prefer to do all my coding in 'C', significant portions are still
programmed in assembler for most of my projects.  I prefer what at least
appears to be a straight forward assembly language, and the AVR seems to cover
this aspect quite well.  I realize I am probably starting to get into religion
here, but those are just my opinions.

    Speaking of AVR, I am getting ready to purchase a developement system (C
compiler and assembler).  Anybody use the ImageCraft system?  The price is
right, but in general, low price == low quality.

    -Jim

Dan Gendreau wrote:

> > ARGH, I hate that word... PIC, yuck..
>
> Yeah, PIC looks nice for some things, but I think I will be going all Atmel
> for the most part.
> At 1MIP/MHz its the best performance for the $ in such a small package.
>
> -Dan G.